Understanding the invisible reality - Chapter II 
Preamble
What really motivates my actions? Why do I have this urge to share with you these things one? Call it research, philosophy, and others will likely consider this as, excuse the term of "intellectual masturbation" ... does not matter really because I think the easiest way to represent This is ultimately the quest for meaning profound nature of our existence . This quest is indeed personal, but it is also deeply universal, as long as there is in any manner whatsoever, came to ask these questions.
Although such philosophical issues about the meaning of our life in the concrete part, by our everyday experience. We could say that the meaning of our life is given him, and this is ultimately true when the question of motivation for our actions, of what motivates our choices. Hence the need to know what motivates our choices. My Articles referring to the new world order as questions about the eschatological mystery, 2012, that have this motivation: understand the world around us . My passion for science, whatever, are similar in nature. And quality, delicate appearance of reality itself is a driving force in these matters.
Moreover, the contemplation of the world would only patchy - see sterile - without a careful study of the observer himself. know the motivation of our choice is ultimately , grasp our inner workings. The reason of my he desires is not the result of events in my life? If the answer is yes, what is the real part, and not unalterable fact of my being? Let
few moments aside these thoughts and let us return to the view that we can ask about "the world around us."
Thus, the world around me (and maybe yours too), do not ask such questions daily. "Boring" is the generic term that references these reflections, moreover, a number of you may no not passed the first three paragraphs. Le Monde, in its frenzied excitement, does not leave, neither time nor space, al'auto-compliance. Yet it would be really necessary to see things as they are, and so perhaps we would not occasion let us caught up in the collective irresponsibility. Our own psyche, as mirrored in this state of affairs, knows how to get carried away by the endless stream of our thoughts and we let ourselves be, willy-nilly, by moods that result.
In contrast to the dominant paradigm of materialism, spirituality - what is the order of mind - leads us to the question consciousness.
"To be conscious is to feel that one feels" dixit Goblot
Our consciousness is related to our sense of being, but our being is not just that. Indeed, the way we look at ourselves is only a fragment - full of illusions - of our being. To "survive" a consciousness repressed desire, as a defense mechanism against oneself. This is where the subconscious. We are filled with sum of unconscious phenomena that affect very real in our daily actions. Make "surfacing" of consciousness these phenomena is the process of psychoanalysis or hypnosis.
Denial
The unconscious prevents us from being truly, fully conscious. Let us briefly to the amazing human faculty of denial. It is a "complex mechanism of defense to live with guilt, anxiety and other disturbing emotions triggered by reality." Denial can be deliberate and intentional, or completely unconscious. According to Stanley Cohen, who discusses the subject of denial in "States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering" (State of Denial: Knowing what are the atrocities and suffering), there are 3 type of denial. First there is the literal denial, the claim that something does not happen or does not exist. The second kind of denial is "interpretive." In this kind of denial, the facts that have occurred are not denied, they are only "interpreted". The third kind of denial is "involvement", there is no attempt to deny the facts or their conventional interpretation: what is actually denied what are the psychological implications, political and legal entities must follow the full recognition. I invite you to look in that perspective the denial of our society towards conspiracy theories. I will not elaborate more on the issues because that is deserving of an article.
In the approach we have followed so far, from conscious to unconscious, we can now return to this question "what is the real part, and not unalterable fact of my being? "A state of being that we could then termed "overconscience.
Before extending the study to this "state of overconscience, note that the concepts of archetype, of morphic fields and egregore previously studied are upstream of this principle. They underlie our reality to the image of the fundamental forces prevailing in the material. The influence of these psychological realities - these invisible worlds - on our own behavior are real, provided that one pays enough attention.
They are called "Flyers" (Castanneda), "larvae" (Bardon) when they have an identification attribute independently, "feeding" literally by our emotions. Notice how your mood will be inefficient when angry or depressed (have a lot of calories burned in depression), conversely, moods "positive" as the joy provides a cocktail of chemical reaction in the brain that generates a well- psychic being - a "good mood" - and a physically fit. Recall in this respect it is recognized that the humanitarian system is greatly influenced by the psychic state of a person.
We can see the mutual influence exercised by our mind on these "invisible psychic forces" and vice versa .
From "overconscience" the atom
What overconscience therefore this situation? To answer this question back on the definition of consciousness: "state in which the subject knows itself as such and distinguished from the subject he knows. "What makes tell Sartre that "All consciousness is consciousness of something."
overconscience The state would, according to this premise: a state in which the subject knows everything (is the energy potential, all are possible in it) but it does not distinguish the object ( at all) he knows. It's "Being" original immutable, formless, then, that "East" in the Absolute.
noted in an apartment here, we will not intentionally use the word "God" to avoid anthropomorphism, conceptual or all deformations duent religions.
It is difficult not to see this state superconscious as anything other than pure mental abstraction. Experience this pristine state, is essentially impossible because, being in this state of "overconscience" we "basing" literally in its essence, making it impossible to "the fact of experiencing the reality of the thing by himself."
A hypothesis: the state called mystical, or "the experimenter feels connected to all things as a part of himself." This state of grace or bliss that speaks the Christian mystics, or "Clear Light of Bliss" Buddhist "enlightenment" in the sense of enlightenment, is a manifestation - our reality - this state of overconscience.
Levels of Consciousness and densities
Before going further into the exploration of consciousness, we must understand the concept of density, these being "levels of conscience. " So here are trying to see what exactly are these "densities".
In simple terms, the mineral kingdom, the reign plant and animal (DNA), and the human kingdom are respectively 1st, 2nd and 3rd density.
Note here, the overlap of our human condition on the 3 kingdoms. We live by and through the first and second density: living on earth, mineral kingdom - the first of density - nourishing the plant and the animal - 2nd - density, sharing its basic structure: DNA with the human kingdom - 3rd density - where the level of consciousness reached its climax when the level of physicality.
Another way of understanding this is to see the "quality" of each of these kingdoms.
The first density is defined then as the "world of the atom," the source of any "physicality" is the birth of space and time. It is a form of consciousness or more precisely a "consciousness of form" (the thought form the most basic).
The second density is defined here as the conscience that feels, remember " man who talks to plants, and benefits of "great music" on them. The plant kingdom feels and feels literally like the animal kingdom, those who have with them a cat or a dog know what I mean. The emotion is born of the consciousness of form is looking at itself. It is a consciousness that extends its own fields of perception "outside of herself." It is "emotional awareness .
The 3rd density could qualify as being aware of consciousness itself. We capture the best sentence Goblet of: "To be conscious is to feel that one feels, in other words it is the consciousness of the form by which emotion she knows exists (" I think therefore I am "of Descartes). Here we extend the fields of perception, we can see our own reflection, it is the birth of the possibility the observer to observe himself. It is "the mental consciousness."
We see here a fundamental notion. It is here that we could integrate the idea of free will, the notion of fundamental initial choice and the "quality" that we attribute to our own conscience. It is awareness of what motivates our choices we discussed above. This choice arises both polarities of our reality. The choice of consciousness or unconsciousness in all.
Only from this "conscience-mirror" that we experience the reality of this duality. She actually governs all densities or levels of consciousness ... it is what we could called "the energy of motion." The yin-yang is the most representative picture of the interdependence and interaction of duality creating movement.
duality initial force of entropy and creative force.
This duality arises from initial "state of overconscience" passing through "the consciousness of form."
is the "original sin" spoken traditions. "Being 'original immutable, formless, then, that" East "in the Absolute, separating from its original state, he" contemplate ", and becomes aware of himself. (The subject is distinguished from the object).
Thus "consciousness pure "creative" non-consciousness "(characterized by the world of the atom). Consciousness "struggle" while animated and non-stop itself in its two poles: to separate or recover its original nature, and at all levels of consciousness or densities.
By analogy with the physical world, the fall in the world of form is the birth of the gravitational force. The duality between on the one hand, the entropic energy for the fall or "inconscientisation" and secondly the creative energy of "awareness" is the representation of the electro-magnetic force (opposites attract).
Physical death and the "4th density"
The subject of near death experiences (or near death experiences) has already been addressed, we will extend not on question. Let us be content simply to emphasize the universality of this experience, assuming a physical afterlife (if not its strongest evidence of "credible." See in this connection the work of Raymond Moody). And the recurrence of a concept of substantial reality, understand here entering another "world" with its own frames of reference.
He was then called "astral" or "ether." We will also use the term "4th density" to follow our reasoning on the levels of consciousness.
The fourth density
remember that, like the first 3 densities entangled in one another, the fourth density is fundamentally linked to its "sub-realities."
Considering the two principles Entropy / Create the two energies conflicting and complementary, which may be the nature of the beings who inhabit it?
We've already talked about the Flyers or larvae, the feeding be inorganic psychic emotions of humans, it strongly resembles a "control system" generated by the principle of entropy. This "control system" trying to keep the human unconscious.
But where is then the principle of creation? The only concept that comes to mind is that the Guardian Angels. Traditions, they are deeply related to Men, their devotion and love is entirely dedicated to Men. They are our connection to the archetypal service creation, service to our re-awareness.
biensur We think the movie "Matrix" or allegories with the description of those realities are many.
What should we understand this? We may at any time serve a two principles, the law of consciousness or its exact opposite. Only the mental effort and understanding of its principles can help us out of our negative patterns. In this, the practice of meditation can be a great help, for, even if that slowed the flow of our thoughts.
What would humans do not undergo the said control system. ?
A human not undergoing the said control system, generate by itself and in itself the principle of creation, that is, the energy re-awareness, he then connects with its archetypal reality that's why he said ascenscionne.
We think of Siddhartha Gautama, the first "Buddha" or Jesus, or some Saints. He has the distinction of having great influence their similar spiritual. Their life is a creation, they are free from mental enslavement. We usually Ascended Master.
The question of Channeling
However, the term "Ascended Master is now so overused that it is synonymous with all sorts of" avatars "that came out of Channeling. Transcommunication this method was formerly used in order to communicate with the dead. With varying degrees of success and that, for the same reason we now describe.
The New Age has valued this practice and today there are many who are intimately persuaded to communicate with "a disembodied entity of high spiritual level," as an "Ascended Master". (The business of New Age with its many publications and conferences is proof)
Let us be clear, it is not actually possible, even probable, that such communications may actually exist. But we suggest first, that the "quality" of the message thus obtained does not depend exclusively on the messenger, far from it, but it is mostly about the deformation of the transcript of the scribe (the channel). On the other hand, the messenger may itself be only a control system disguised as a "super-entity." Expectations of the scribe when the meeting was "super-normal" providing a powerful energy. If the intent of the channel is laudable, it is no less subject to manipulation.
we see here is how subtly skewed notion of master and apprentice, and merging it into the master (as in Buddhism in particular). The kind of confusion as it goes unnoticed, yet it has no relation with its classic design. The
initial duality in fourth density.
initial duality, in this reality 4th density, then take the terminology of "low-Astral" or "high-astral", note the correspondence with the concepts of hell and paradise. The lower astral entities could match the flyers Castanneda, the control system mentioned above. The chart above does not have to be feeding on the energy of "entities below, since they generate their own energy. In the energy of creation / re-awareness is free others from the yoke of unconsciousness which then feeds its energy. is the gift of self that self-sustaining.
Do we have conceptual models which could suggest the nature of this 4th density?
Again NDEs tell us the number of "journey" takes place in tangible realities that non-physical in the sense that we commonly hear.
Most religions include some idea of the afterlife in one form or another. The Thodol Bardot, Tibetan Book of the Dead described with great precision the steps that follow the "great start". The book by Bernard Werber "Thanatonautes the" city of many traditions of this reality. It speaks of a world where time and space have no meaning we usually give him. In occultism, it is even said that any event in our world (3rd density) is preceded by its setting in the "astral".
The astral is that, in many respects similar "to the dream world." I think we can say with little confidence that the world of our dreams is a form of astral world. That at least one fairly accessible to imagine the thing. Dreams are bubbles unconscious projection of our message "back to the surface." The chart is then produced by the collective thought-forms. Therefore said that in this reality, an object, take a picture paint a house, will exist as long as we think of his existence in this place, it will persist in the astral, even if we ' remove from its place. The astral is therefore that of thought-form. But it is not entirely "paperless."
Are there any physical theories admit a underlying reality to ours, "containing" our four-dimensional reality, and having some physical reality?
It is interesting to note that a 5-dimensional spaces have been conceptualized and we will see that these implications are at least interesting, although theoretical, it is possible that we are not so far from the truth.
The fifth dimension of Kaluza
Historically, the first attempt at defining the fifth dimension has Kaluza in 1921. This definition was further discussed by Einstein in 1938 in collaboration with P. Bergmann in an article titled "Generalization of Kaluza was Theroy of Electricity's" (Generalization of Kaluza's Theory on Electricity) [1] :
"so far, two relatively simple and natural attempts were made to conne ct gravitation and electricity by means of a unitary field theory: one by Weyl, the other by Kaluza. In addition, it has been tried several times to formally represent Kaluza's theory in order to avoid the introduction of a fifth dimension of the physical continuum. The theory presented here differs from Kaluza in one essential point: we ascribe physical reality to the fifth dimension , whereas in Kaluza's theory this fifth dimension was introduced only in order to obtain new components of the metric that represents the content of electromagnetic fields. (...) If
Kaluza's attempt is a real step forward, then it is thanks to the introduction of the five-dimensional space. Many attempts were made to retain the formal results obtained by Kaluza without sacrificing the character of four-dimensional physical space. This clearly shows how strongly our physical intuition resists the introduction of a fifth dimension. But if we consider and compare all these attempts, we must conclude that all these efforts have not improved the situation. It seems impossible to formulate the idea of a Kaluza simple way, without introducing the fifth dimension.
So we must take seriously the fifth dimension, although ordinary experience does not encourage it. If so the structure of space seems to force us to accept the theory of a five-dimensional space , we must ask whether it makes sense to assume the rigorous reducibility to four dimensional space. We believe that the answer should be "no" provided that it is possible to understand otherwise the quasi-four-dimensional physical space by taking the continuum basis five-dimensional and simplifying assumptions and basic geometric. [...] The most important of our theory is the replacement of a rigorous cylindricity by the assumption that space is closed (or periodic) . [...] Kaluza's theory on the five dimensions of physical space provides a unitary representation of gravitation and electromagnetism. [...] There is much more satisfactory to introduce the fifth dimension not only formally but also giving it some physical meaning. "
A. Einstein , P. Bergmann,
Annals of Mathematics Vol 38, No. 3, July 1938
Understanding this theory can lead us to accept the unexplained phenomena such as telepathy or precognition in a different light. The idea here is that in this new dimension, the four-dimensional space is "entangled" in a frame of reference, cyclical in nature ("the space is closed (or periodic)"). phenomena known as "psi" is therefore conducted in these areas non-linear time.
space in a given time, for a certain period includes a wealth of information, many events took place there. In this new dimension, the amount of information in this "place-time" is instantaneous. For example it's like you get to take a photograph of a scene for an entire year.
I think we can make a connection with the moments of synchronicity, those moments where the meaning of an event is not linked by a causal link. It seems to me that there is a form of direct experimentation of the 4th density. Thus, this space-time is not subject to link causality is experienced in our reality because his frames of reference are not linear.
We have seen in a previous article, "The effect Kirlian and light radiation of DNA , the possible detection of the physical body from these realities. Process means for sensing electromagnetic radiation of the human body. The etheric body and the body of light there is also a more "rational". This may be a way of understanding the "physical meaning" mentioned Einstein.
linear time and cyclical time
Remember now the words of CG Jung's collective unconscious:
I call group because, unlike the personal unconscious, it is not the content is more or less unique individual, non-breeding, but of content that are universal, and which appear regularly "
As the words of R. Sheldrake's morphic fields on (or morphogenic) :
Natural systems such as colonies of termites, pigeons, orchids, insulin molecules inherit a collective memory containing all the phenomena on their species, as distant as they are in the space and time .
reappear here we see the idea of an underlying reality to our, or the dimensions of space-time no longer the same frames of references. The cyclical nature of these phenomena is highly probable.
Remember the words of Homer Trimegiste on his Table of Emerald: "What is below is like what is above and what is above is like what is down to the miracles of one thing. . In this image, the cyclic phenomena of nature, the seasons of the moon, via comets are similar to the underlying nature of our reality: its manifestations are cyclical in nature.
Do we have "proof" of this cyclical reality underlying our linear reality? The law of correspondence in the "What is above is like what is below" at'elle other things to teach us? What is the relationship with the ancient esoteric traditions? The prophecies are they from a meeting with the 4th density?
We try to answer these questions in response to our inquiry into the invisible reality ...
(Article also published on Attack-thought-single
- [1] Those who object that does not introduce Einsteinian physics, itself, the notion of speed in the time nor the notion of displacement in time (this has involved a 5-dimensional space). We spoke mainly of traveling in space. In Einstein's theory, temporal aspects arising from movements in space. We can therefore specify a theory (accepted by physicists), which proposes a unification of the forces of nature. This is the five-dimensional theory of Jordan-Thiry. The Jordan-Thiry theory admits that the Lagrange equation can be written with respect to a variable u which plays over the space-time the same role that time plays relationship to space, we have here a definition of the fifth dimension identical to that introduced earlier. The variable u plays the role of the fifth dimension. One can characterize this dimension of hyper-time, super-time, or another name recalling the logic of building that size.
What is the unit of this size? This is still a big mystery and I think he, a great challenge for physics. It could be that this unit makes intervene consciousness.
CG Jung spoke of archetypes and as thought-forms, "the archetypes are autonomous and can resonate with the human conscience. " 
The concept of morphic fields R. Sheldrake suggests that the nature of things, each type of natural system has its own type of field. These are regions of influence extending into non-physical space and extending in time. memory in morphic fields is cumulative, and that is why all sorts of phenomena are becoming more normal repetition. 
"In addition to men and other beings who inhabit this earth, there in the universe a vast range of entities inorganic. They are present among us, and at times are visible. We call them ghosts or apparitions. They do not "eat" not literally, what they do is transfer vibration. Consciousness is energy 
A 'Larva' may be material or mental astral matter; is usually a creature as it astral was created by the constant repetition of a thought intense, fueled by a particular passion, bad habit or other defects. A person usually creates these things recklessly from the astral or mental substance, then extracted his own mental body or astral body. 
